Hey, tomorrow's my birthday.
Here's what I read in the two issues of the New Yorker that I had lying around.
Itsy-Bitsy Teeny-Weeny: On The Trauma of Swimsuit Shopping, by Patricia Marx.
I don't know why I started reading this, but it's an interesting and funny article on the insanity of female clothing disguised as a fashion article. The only sane person is the mother who clads her daughter in surfer-style lycra outfits.
Soft-boiled: Pynchon's Stoned Detective, by Louis Menand. Not so much a review, but a clever article about a newly released book. While the New York Times actually had the chutzpah to almost dislike the book, Menand keeps it tongue-in-cheek and is probably letting the reader decide if he or she wants to spend time curled up with another Pynchonian trip to paranoia-ville. Disliking Pynchon seems to be all the rage these days, with English professors across the nation decrying his self-indulgence, weirdness, goofiness, and self-indulgence.
But if hating on Pynchon is hip, I'm glad to be square.
The Courthouse Ring: Atticus Finch and the Limits of Southern Liberalism, by Malcolm Gladwell. A concise and fascinating article that discusses the true nature of Atticus Finch in Lee Harper's To Kill a Mockingbird. Gladwell compares Finch to smooth-talking baby-kissing "Big Jim" Folsom, famed caricature of a Southern politician, who believed in humanity and civility for all people, but stops well short of being a civil rights proponent. Gladwell deftly demonstrates that the two are eerily similar in their approach to racism, and goes on to reveal some rather distressing aspects of the much-lauded Atticus.
Perhaps it's my white-guilt talking, but I still hold Atticus Finch in high regard -- though I may just be blinded by the impressive manliness of Gregory Peck.